Landmark IBD trials
The trials that shape how we treat Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Each summary gives the design, the primary result with its numbers, a key figure, and the one thing to remember. Every number is checked against the published paper.
79 of 79 trials
- 2026 · Gastroenterology
ADMIRE CD II
Darvadstrocel vs placebo · Perianal CD
ADMIRE CD II95% CI
ADMIRE CD II: +2.4 (95% CI −5.8 to 10.6).
+2.4 points (95% CI −5.8 to 10.6)
In the larger confirmatory trial, darvadstrocel was no better than placebo for complex perianal fistulas when both arms had surgical preparation.
n 568Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2026 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
ASTRO
Guselkumab SC vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 12 · both guselkumab groups pooled
Clinical remission, Week 12 · both guselkumab groups pooled: Guselkumab 28%, Placebo 6%.
Adjusted difference +21 points (95% CI 14–28); P<0.0001
Guselkumab can be started with subcutaneous 400 mg injections instead of IV infusions, with clear benefit over placebo by week 12.
n 418Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2026 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
RELIEVE UCCD (CD)
Duvakitug 450 or 900 mg vs placebo · CD
Endoscopic responseWeek 14
Endoscopic response, Week 14: Duvakitug 450 mg 26%, Duvakitug 900 mg 48%, Placebo 13%.
Posterior mean difference vs placebo: 450 mg 13% (95% credible interval −3 to 29); 900 mg 33% (16 to 50)
Duvakitug, an anti-TL1A antibody, gave a dose-related endoscopic response signal in Crohn's disease in phase 2b; phase 3 trials will decide whether TL1A becomes a new Crohn's disease target.
n 139Phase 2b RCT - 2026 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
RELIEVE UCCD (UC)
Duvakitug 450 or 900 mg vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 14 · modified Mayo score
Clinical remission, Week 14 · modified Mayo score: Duvakitug 450 mg 36%, Duvakitug 900 mg 48%, Placebo 20%.
Posterior mean difference vs placebo: 450 mg 15% (95% credible interval −3 to 33); 900 mg 26% (8 to 44)
Duvakitug, an anti-TL1A antibody, showed a dose-related remission signal in UC in phase 2b; phase 3 trials will decide its place.
n 137Phase 2b RCT - 2026 · Gastroenterology
REScUE
Ustekinumab every 4 vs every 8 weeks after IV reinduction · CD
Steroid-free clinical remissionWeek 48 · PRO2 remission, calprotectin below 250 µg/g, no steroids
Steroid-free clinical remission, Week 48 · PRO2 remission, calprotectin below 250 µg/g, no steroids: Every 4 weeks 15%, Every 8 weeks 19%.
Difference 4%; P=0.5
After secondary loss of response to ustekinumab, IV reinduction plus every-4-week dosing is no better than reinduction plus every-8-week dosing, and few patients regain remission either way.
n 108RCT - 2026 · Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Upadacitinib plus vedolizumab induction
Upadacitinib + vedolizumab vs vedolizumab · UC
Endoscopic remissionMayo endoscopic subscore 0
Endoscopic remission, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0: Combination 37.5%, Vedolizumab 15.1%.
Endoscopic remission 37.5% vs 15.1%; +22.4 points (95% CI 5.3–39.5)
Adding 8 weeks of upadacitinib to vedolizumab induction improved early endoscopic remission over vedolizumab alone, but this small open-label trial is hypothesis-generating.
n 120Open-label RCT - 2026 · Gut
USTAP
Ustekinumab vs placebo for perianal fistulas · Perianal CD
Combined remission95% CI
Combined remission: 5.1 (95% CI 1.07–24.4).
Combined remission 62% vs 25%; OR 5.1 (95% CI 1.07–24.4)
In a small trial, ustekinumab after surgical drainage improved short-term combined clinical and MRI remission of perianal fistulas, but the effect was uncertain by week 48.
n 32Double-blind RCT - 2025 · Gut
ACTIVE
Infliximab + azathioprine vs azathioprine · UC
Treatment failureWeek 52 · composite; lower is better
Treatment failure, Week 52 · composite; lower is better: Combination 53.3%, Azathioprine 81.5%.
Treatment failure 53.3% vs 81.5% at week 52; P=0.03
After a steroid-responsive episode of acute severe UC in a thiopurine- and biologic-naive patient, starting infliximab plus azathioprine reduced 1-year treatment failure compared with azathioprine alone.
n 64Open-label RCT - 2025 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
DIVERSITY
Filgotinib vs placebo · CD
Difference, percentage points95% CIs
A: PRO2 remission: +6.9 (95% CI −1.4 to 15.2); A: endoscopy: +5.5 (95% CI −2.0 to 12.9); B: PRO2 remission: +11.9 (95% CI 3.7–20.2); B: endoscopy: +0.1 (95% CI −6.5 to 6.6).
Week-10 co-primaries missed; both met at week 58 in responders
Filgotinib failed its week-10 induction endpoints in Crohn's disease, unlike upadacitinib in its own phase 3 trials, so JAK inhibitors should not be assumed to work equally well in Crohn's disease.
n 1,372Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2025 · Gut
EXIT
Continue vs stop anti-TNF · UC and CD
Sustained clinical remission12 months
Sustained clinical remission, 12 months: Continue anti-TNF 84%, Stop (placebo) 76%.
Sustained remission 84% vs 76% at 12 months; P=0.2
In carefully selected patients in deep remission who stay on an immunomodulator, stopping the anti-TNF did not significantly reduce 1-year sustained remission, but calprotectin rose more often; withdrawal is an option to discuss, not a default.
n 140Double-blind RCT - 2025 · Lancet
GALAXI-2 and GALAXI-3
Guselkumab vs placebo and ustekinumab · CD
Response + clinical remissionGALAXI-2 · weeks 12 and 48
Response + clinical remission, GALAXI-2 · weeks 12 and 48: 200 mg 55%, 100 mg 49%, Placebo 12%.
GALAXI-2 response + remission 55% (200 mg) vs 12% placebo; P<0.0001
IV guselkumab induction followed by SC maintenance is effective in Crohn's disease and outperformed ustekinumab at week 48 on several endpoints.
n 1,048Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2025 · Gastroenterology
GRAVITI
Guselkumab SC vs placebo · CD
Clinical remissionWeek 12 · both guselkumab groups pooled
Clinical remission, Week 12 · both guselkumab groups pooled: Guselkumab 56.1%, Placebo 21.4%.
Week-12 remission 56.1% vs 21.4%; endoscopic response 41.3% vs 21.4%
Guselkumab can be given entirely by subcutaneous injection for both induction and maintenance in Crohn's disease, with no IV infusion needed.
n 347Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2025 · GastroenterologyMust know
Intestinal ultrasound in pregnancy
Active vs inactive disease on intestinal ultrasound · UC and CD
Maximal bowel wall thickness above 6 mm on ultrasoundRelative risk, 95% CIs
Preterm birth: 4.01 (95% CI 1.26–12.72); Low birth weight: 2.19 (95% CI 1.01–4.72); Pre-eclampsia: 3.46 (95% CI 1.03–11.12).
Bowel wall over 6 mm: preterm birth RR 4.01 (95% CI 1.26–12.72)
In pregnancy, inflammation seen on intestinal ultrasound was associated with preterm birth, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia independently of symptoms and calprotectin; consider ultrasound to monitor IBD antenatally.
n 377Cohort study - 2025 · Lancet
QUASAR
Guselkumab vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionInduction · week 12
Clinical remission, Induction · week 12: Guselkumab IV 23%, Placebo 8%.
Adjusted difference 15% (95% CI 10–20); P<0.0001
Guselkumab induces and maintains remission in UC, and the follow-up ASTRO trial showed induction can be given subcutaneously.
n 701Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2025 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
REPREVIO
Postoperative vedolizumab vs placebo · CD
Primary result
Probability of a lower modified Rutgeerts score with vedolizumab than placebo: 77.8% (95% CI 66.4–86.3); P<0.0001.
Starting vedolizumab within 4 weeks of ileocolonic resection reduces early endoscopic recurrence in patients at risk.
n 84Double-blind RCT - 2025 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
TUSCANY-2
Afimkibart vs placebo · UC
Total Mayo score · primary endpointRisk difference, percentage points, 90% CIs
50 mg: +13.9 (90% CI −0.2 to 27.7); 150 mg: +11.7 (90% CI −1.7 to 24.1); 450 mg: +12.2 (90% CI −0.6 to 22.9).
Primary endpoint missed at every dose; 90% CIs cross zero
Afimkibart missed its phase 2b primary endpoint (total Mayo remission), although remission by the modified Mayo score favoured it; anti-TL1A therapy still needs phase 3 proof.
n 246Phase 2b double-blind RCT - 2024 · N Engl J Med
ARTEMIS-UC
Tulisokibart vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 12 · cohort 1, all patients (135)
Clinical remission, Week 12 · cohort 1, all patients (135): Tulisokibart 26%, Placebo 1%.
+25 points (95% CI 14–37); P<0.001
Anti-TL1A therapy is a new mechanism in UC; tulisokibart produced a large placebo-adjusted remission rate in a short phase 2 trial, with phase 3 results still awaited.
n 178Phase 2 double-blind RCT - 2024 · JAMA
INSPIRE and COMMAND
Risankizumab vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 12 · induction (INSPIRE)
Clinical remission, Week 12 · induction (INSPIRE): 1200 mg IV 20.3%, Placebo 6.2%.
Induction remission 20.3% vs 6.2%; maintenance 40.2% (180 mg) vs 25.1%
Risankizumab induces and maintains remission in UC, including after advanced-therapy failure, and many week-12 non-responders respond to extended induction.
n 977Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2024 · Gastroenterology
LIBERTY-CD
Subcutaneous infliximab vs placebo (maintenance) · CD
Clinical remissionWeek 54
Clinical remission, Week 54: SC infliximab 62.3%, Placebo 32.1%.
P<0.0001
After IV infliximab induction, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks maintains remission and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease, an option for patients who prefer injections to infusions.
n 396Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2024 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
PREDICT-UC
Infliximab 10 vs 5 mg/kg first dose in acute severe UC · UC
Clinical response by day 7First dose 10 vs 5 mg/kg
Clinical response by day 7, First dose 10 vs 5 mg/kg: 10 mg/kg 65%, 5 mg/kg, pooled 61%.
Risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine history 1.06 (95% CI 0.94–1.20); P=0.32
In steroid-refractory acute severe UC, a 10 mg/kg first infliximab dose or an accelerated schedule was not better than standard 5 mg/kg dosing.
n 138Open-label RCT - 2024 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
PROFILE
Top-down infliximab plus immunomodulator vs accelerated step-up · CD
Sustained steroid- and surgery-free remissionTo week 48
Sustained steroid- and surgery-free remission, To week 48: Top-down 79%, Step-up 15%.
Absolute difference 64 percentage points (95% CI 57–72); P<0.0001
In newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease, starting infliximab plus an immunomodulator straight away gives far better 1-year and 5-year outcomes than step-up care.
n 386Open-label RCT - 2024 · N Engl J MedMust know
SEQUENCE
Risankizumab vs ustekinumab · CD
Endoscopic remissionWeek 48 · SES-CD ≤4
Endoscopic remission, Week 48 · SES-CD ≤4: Risankizumab 31.8%, Ustekinumab 16.2%.
Adjusted difference +15.6 points (95% CI 8.4–22.9); P<0.001
After anti-TNF failure, risankizumab beats ustekinumab for endoscopic remission, so an IL-23 p19 inhibitor is the stronger second-line choice of the two.
n 520Phase 3b open-label RCT - 2024 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
SPICY
Extended vs mesenteric-sparing resection · CD
Endoscopic recurrence6 months
Endoscopic recurrence, 6 months: Extended 42%, Sparing 43%.
Relative risk 0.985 (95% CI 0.663–1.464); P=1.0
Removing more mesentery at primary ileocolic resection did not reduce 6-month endoscopic recurrence, and leaks were numerically more common.
n 139RCT - 2024 · Am J Gastroenterol
TACOS
Tofacitinib vs placebo, added to IV steroids · UC
Response by day 7Primary endpoint
Response by day 7: Tofacitinib 83.01%, Placebo 58.82%.
OR 3.42 (95% CI 1.37–8.48); P=0.007
Adding tofacitinib to IV steroids improved day-7 response in acute severe UC in one small single-centre trial; promising, but not yet standard care.
n 104Double-blind RCT - 2024 · Lancet
VIVID-1
Mirikizumab vs placebo · CD
Endoscopic-response compositeWeek 12 response + week 52 endoscopic response
Endoscopic-response composite, Week 12 response + week 52 endoscopic response: Mirikizumab 38.0%, Placebo 9.0%.
Endoscopic-response composite 38.0% vs 9.0%; CDAI-remission composite 45.4% vs 19.6%
Mirikizumab, an IL-23 p19 inhibitor, induces and maintains clinical and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease, including after biologic failure.
n 1,150Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2023 · N Engl J Med
EARNEST
Vedolizumab vs placebo · Pouchitis
mPDAI remission95% CI
mPDAI remission: +21 (95% CI 5–38).
mPDAI remission 31% vs 10% at week 14; +21 points (95% CI 5–38)
Vedolizumab is the first advanced therapy shown in a randomised trial to induce remission in chronic pouchitis.
n 102Phase 4 double-blind RCT - 2023 · Lancet
ELEVATE UC 52 and UC 12
Etrasimod vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionUC 52 · week 52, treat-through
Clinical remission, UC 52 · week 52, treat-through: Etrasimod 2 mg 32%, Placebo 7%.
Week-52 remission 32% vs 7% in a treat-through design; P<0.0001
Etrasimod, a once-daily oral S1P modulator, induces and maintains remission in UC, shown in a stricter treat-through design.
n 787Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2023 · N Engl J Med
LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2
Mirikizumab vs placebo · UC
LUCENT-1 inductionClinical remission, week 12 · 300 mg IV every 4 weeks
LUCENT-1 induction, Clinical remission, week 12 · 300 mg IV every 4 weeks: Mirikizumab 24.2%, Placebo 13.3%.
P<0.001
Mirikizumab, an IL-23 p19 antibody, induces and maintains remission in UC and improves bowel urgency.
n 1,281Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2023 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
SPARE
Stop infliximab vs stop immunosuppressant · CD
Relapse by 2 yearsCo-primary endpoint
Relapse by 2 years, Co-primary endpoint: Continue both 14%, Stop infliximab 36%, Stop immunosuppressant 10%.
Stop infliximab vs continue both: HR 3.45 (95% CI 1.56–7.69)
If you de-escalate combination therapy in stable Crohn's disease, stop the immunosuppressant, not infliximab; relapse is much less likely.
n 211Open-label RCT - 2023 · N Engl J Med
U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED and U-ENDURE
Upadacitinib vs placebo · CD
U-EXCEED endoscopic responseWeek 12 · biologic failure
U-EXCEED endoscopic response, Week 12 · biologic failure: 45 mg 34.6%, Placebo 3.5%.
Endoscopic response after biologic failure 34.6% vs 3.5% at week 12 (P<0.001)
Oral upadacitinib induces and maintains clinical remission and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease, including after biologic failure, with JAK-class safety issues to monitor.
n 1,021Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2023 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
VEGA
Guselkumab + golimumab vs either alone · UC
Adjusted difference, percentage points80% CIs
vs golimumab: +22.1 (80% CI 12.9–31.3); vs guselkumab: +8.5 (80% CI −0.2 to 17.1).
Combination vs golimumab +22.1 points; vs guselkumab +8.5 (80% CIs)
Combining an anti-TNF with an IL-23 antibody for induction outperformed golimumab alone but did not clearly separate from guselkumab alone; this phase 2 signal needs phase 3 confirmation.
n 214Phase 2 double-blind RCT - 2022 · Lancet
ADVANCE and MOTIVATE
Risankizumab IV vs placebo · CD
CDAI clinical remissionADVANCE · week 12
CDAI clinical remission, ADVANCE · week 12: 600 mg 45%, 1200 mg 42%, Placebo 25%.
ADVANCE CDAI remission 45% (600 mg) vs 25%; all co-primaries met
IV risankizumab induction works in both biologic-naive and biologic-experienced Crohn's disease, with endoscopic response rates well above placebo.
n 1,549Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2022 · Lancet
FORTIFY
Risankizumab SC vs withdrawal · CD
CDAI clinical remissionWeek 52 · co-primary in the US protocol
CDAI clinical remission, Week 52 · co-primary in the US protocol: 180 mg 55%, 360 mg 52%, Withdrawal 41%.
Endoscopic response 47% (360 mg) vs 22% after withdrawal at week 52
SC risankizumab maintains remission and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease, with 360 mg every 8 weeks giving the most consistent benefit.
n 542Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2022 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
GARDENIA
Etrolizumab vs infliximab · UC
Response and remission95% CI
Response and remission: −0.9 (95% CI −8.7 to 6.8).
−0.9 points (95% CI −8.7 to 6.8)
Etrolizumab, an anti-β7 integrin antibody, did not beat infliximab in anti-TNF-naive UC, and it never became a treatment option.
n 397Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2022 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Obefazimod phase 2b
Obefazimod (three doses) vs placebo · UC
Primary result
Least-squares mean change −2.9 (100 mg), −3.2 (50 mg) and −3.1 (25 mg) vs −1.9 (placebo); P=0.0039, P=0.0003 and P=0.0010 vs placebo
Obefazimod is a first-in-class oral drug with a new mechanism that improved UC activity in phase 2b; its place will depend on the phase 3 ABTECT results once they are published.
n 254Phase 2b double-blind RCT - 2022 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
PISA-II
Surgical closure vs anti-TNF alone (perianal fistula) · Perianal CD
Radiological healingMRI at 18 months
Radiological healing, MRI at 18 months: Surgical closure 32%, Anti-TNF alone 9%.
P=0.005
For a high perianal fistula with a single internal opening, surgical closure after seton and short anti-TNF gives more MRI healing and fewer reinterventions than anti-TNF alone, and MRI healing predicts durable closure.
n 94RCT - 2022 · LancetMust know
SEAVUE
Ustekinumab vs adalimumab · CD
Clinical remission95% CI
Clinical remission: +4 (95% CI −6 to 14).
+4 points (95% CI −6 to 14)
In biologic-naive moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, ustekinumab was not superior to adalimumab monotherapy at 1 year and both worked well, so choose by patient factors, safety and preference.
n 386Phase 3b double-blind RCT - 2022 · Gastroenterology
SERENE-CD
Higher vs standard adalimumab induction · CD
Clinical remissionWeek 4
Clinical remission, Week 4: Higher dose 44%, Standard dose 44%.
Remission 44% vs 44% at week 4; endoscopic response 43% vs 39% at week 12
Extra-intensive adalimumab induction does not beat the standard 160/80 mg regimen, and proactive TDM-guided maintenance was no better than dosing adjusted to symptoms and CRP.
n 514Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2022 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
STARDUST
Treat to target vs standard of care · CD
Endoscopic responseSES-CD down ≥50%
Endoscopic response, SES-CD down ≥50%: Treat to target 38%, Standard of care 30%.
Endoscopic response 38% vs 30% at week 48; P=0.087
With ustekinumab, an endoscopy-driven treat-to-target algorithm did not improve 48-week endoscopic response over clinically driven care; treat-to-target only helps if escalation has something to add.
n 440Phase 3b open-label RCT - 2022 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
STRIDENT
Intensive vs standard adalimumab for strictures · CD
Obstructive symptoms improved14-day symptom score down ≥1 point
Obstructive symptoms improved, 14-day symptom score down ≥1 point: Intensive 79%, Standard 64%.
OR 2.10 (95% CI 0.73–6.01); P=0.17
Symptomatic Crohn's strictures with active inflammation often respond to adalimumab; intensifying therapy did not significantly improve symptoms; secondary results on treatment failure and MRI stricture appearance favoured it but are hypothesis-generating.
n 77Open-label RCT - 2022 · LancetMust know
U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH
Upadacitinib vs placebo · UC
U-ACHIEVE inductionWeek 8
U-ACHIEVE induction, Week 8: 45 mg 26%, Placebo 5%.
Adjusted difference 21.6% (95% CI 15.8–27.4); P<0.0001
Upadacitinib 45 mg for 8 weeks, then 15 mg or 30 mg daily, gives some of the highest placebo-adjusted remission rates of any UC therapy.
n 996Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2022 · J Crohns Colitis
VISIBLE 2
Vedolizumab SC vs placebo · CD
Clinical remissionCDAI ≤150
Clinical remission, CDAI ≤150: Vedolizumab SC 48.0%, Placebo 34.3%.
+13.7 points (95% CI 3.8–23.7); P=0.008
After two IV doses, vedolizumab 108 mg SC every 2 weeks maintains remission in Crohn's disease better than placebo, so patients can switch to home injections.
n 410Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2021 · Gastroenterology
DINE-CD
Specific Carbohydrate Diet vs Mediterranean diet · CD
Symptomatic remissionWeek 6
Symptomatic remission, Week 6: Specific Carbohydrate 46.5%, Mediterranean 43.5%.
P=0.77; Specific Carbohydrate Diet not superior
In adults with mild-to-moderate Crohn's symptoms, the restrictive Specific Carbohydrate Diet was no better than a Mediterranean diet, so the easier, healthier Mediterranean diet is the reasonable default.
n 194RCT - 2021 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
HAYABUSA
Continue vs stop infliximab · UC
RemissionWeek 48
Remission, Week 48: Continue 80.4%, Stop 54.3%.
Remission 80.4% vs 54.3% at week 48; difference 26.1% (95% CI 7.7–44.5)
Stopping infliximab in UC remission lowered remission at week 48 (54.3% vs 80.4% when continued), although most patients respond to retreatment; continue anti-TNF therapy unless there is a strong reason to stop.
n 95Open-label RCT - 2021 · JAMA
NOR-DRUM B
Proactive drug monitoring vs standard infliximab · UC and CD
Sustained disease controlNo disease worsening over 52 weeks
Sustained disease control, No disease worsening over 52 weeks: Proactive TDM 73.6%, Standard therapy 55.9%.
Adjusted difference 17.6% (95% CI 9.0–26.2); P<0.001
In patients on maintenance infliximab, scheduled drug-level monitoring with a dosing algorithm kept more patients in sustained disease control over a year than standard dosing without levels.
n 458Open-label RCT - 2021 · GastroenterologyMust know
PIANO
Biologics and thiopurines vs no exposure · UC and CD
Any infant infection in year 1 · adjusted odds ratioRatio, 95% CIs
Biologic: 0.92 (95% CI 0.70–1.20); Thiopurine: 0.90 (95% CI 0.64–1.28); Combination: 0.93 (95% CI 0.66–1.32).
No increase in any primary outcome with drug exposure
Biologics and thiopurines, alone or together, did not increase pregnancy or infant harms; active disease did, so continue effective therapy through pregnancy.
n 1,490Cohort study - 2021 · Lancet
SELECTION
Filgotinib vs placebo · UC
Induction A: biologic-naiveWeek 10
Induction A: biologic-naive, Week 10: Filgotinib 200 mg 26.1%, Placebo 15.3%.
Difference 10.8% (95% CI 2.1–19.5); P=0.0157
Filgotinib 200 mg induces and maintains remission in UC, but it is not available in Canada; it matters here mainly as evidence for the JAK class.
n 1,348Phase 2b/3 double-blind RCT - 2021 · N Engl J Med
True North
Ozanimod vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 10 · induction
Clinical remission, Week 10 · induction: Ozanimod 18.4%, Placebo 6.0%.
Remission 18.4% vs 6.0% at week 10 and 37.0% vs 18.5% at week 52
Ozanimod, a once-daily oral S1P receptor modulator, induces and maintains remission in UC with a low serious-infection rate.
n 645Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2020 · Gut
TRUST&UC
Ultrasound monitoring through a UC flare · UC
Increased bowel wall thickness, % of patientsWeek (0 = at flare) 0 to 12
Sigmoid colon: 89.3% at week (0 = at flare) 0, 32% at 12; Descending colon: 83% at week (0 = at flare) 0, 37.6% at 12.
Sigmoid thickening 89.3% at flare, 38.6% by week 2 (P<0.001)
Intestinal ultrasound shows bowel wall thickening in most UC flares and tracks response within 2 weeks, so it is a practical point-of-care tool for monitoring UC treatment.
n 253Observational study - 2020 · Gastroenterology
VISIBLE 1
Vedolizumab SC vs IV vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 52
Clinical remission, Week 52: SC vedolizumab 46.2%, IV vedolizumab 42.6%, Placebo 14.3%.
SC vs placebo +32.3 points (95% CI 19.7–45.0); P<0.001
After two IV induction doses, vedolizumab can be maintained with 108 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks, with remission rates numerically similar to IV.
n 216Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2019 · Gastroenterology
CDED plus PEN vs EEN
CDED + partial EN vs exclusive EN · CD
Tolerated the dietPrimary endpoint
Tolerated the diet: CDED + PEN 97.5%, EEN 73.6%.
P=0.002; odds ratio 13.92 (95% CI 1.68–115.14)
In children with mild to moderate Crohn's disease, CDED plus partial enteral nutrition is better tolerated than exclusive enteral nutrition and gives more sustained remission at 12 weeks.
n 78RCT - 2019 · Gastroenterology
PAILOT
Proactive vs reactive adalimumab monitoring (children) · CD
Sustained steroid-free remissionAt every visit, weeks 8–72
Sustained steroid-free remission, At every visit, weeks 8–72: Proactive 82%, Reactive 48%.
P=0.002
In children on adalimumab, proactive trough monitoring with dose adjustment to 5 µg/mL kept far more patients in steroid-free remission than reactive testing.
n 78Open-label RCT - 2019 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
PANTS
Predictors of anti-TNF failure (infliximab, adalimumab) · CD
Primary non-response at week 14 · odds ratio for week-14 drug levelRatio, 95% CIs
Infliximab: 0.35 (95% CI 0.20–0.62); Adalimumab: 0.13 (95% CI 0.06–0.28).
Week-14 drug level and non-response: OR 0.35 (infliximab), 0.13 (adalimumab)
Anti-TNF failure in Crohn's disease is common and is driven largely by low drug levels and immunogenicity; an immunomodulator reduces antibodies, and primary non-responders need a change, not more of the same.
n 1,610Cohort study - 2019 · N Engl J MedMust know
UNIFI
Ustekinumab vs placebo · UC
Clinical remissionWeek 8 · induction
Clinical remission, Week 8 · induction: 130 mg IV 15.6%, About 6 mg/kg IV 15.5%, Placebo 5.3%.
Remission 15.5% vs 5.3% at week 8; 43.8% vs 24.0% at week 44 (every 8 weeks)
Ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 antibody, induces and maintains remission in UC with a reassuring safety profile.
n 961Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2019 · N Engl J MedMust know
VARSITY
Vedolizumab vs adalimumab · UC
Clinical remission95% CI
Clinical remission: +8.8 (95% CI 2.5–15.0).
+8.8 points (95% CI 2.5–15.0)
In the first head-to-head biologic trial in IBD, vedolizumab beat adalimumab for clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at 52 weeks in UC.
n 769Phase 3b double-blind RCT - 2018 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
METRIC
MR enterography vs ultrasound · CD
Sensitivity for extentPer-patient estimate, 95% CI
Sensitivity for extent: MR enterography 80% (95% CI 72–86), Ultrasound 70% (95% CI 62–78).
Difference 10% (95% CI 1–18); P=0.027
Both MR enterography and intestinal ultrasound detect small bowel Crohn's disease with high sensitivity; MR enterography maps extent somewhat more accurately, while ultrasound is a valid first-line, point-of-care alternative.
n 284Diagnostic accuracy study - 2017 · LancetMust know
CALM
Tight control vs clinical management · CD
Mucosal healing, no deep ulcersWeek 48
Mucosal healing, no deep ulcers, Week 48: Tight control 46%, Clinical management 30%.
Adjusted risk difference 16.1% (95% CI 3.9–28.3); P=0.010
Escalating therapy on biomarkers plus symptoms, rather than symptoms alone, gives more mucosal healing in early Crohn's disease.
n 244Phase 3 open-label RCT - 2017 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
LIR!C
Laparoscopic ileocaecal resection vs infliximab · CD
Primary result
Mean IBDQ 178.1 (95% CI 171.1–185.0) after resection vs 172.0 (164.3–179.6) with infliximab; mean difference 6.1 points (95% CI −4.2 to 16.4); P=0.25.
For limited (40 cm or less), non-stricturing terminal ileal Crohn's disease that has failed conventional therapy, laparoscopic resection is a reasonable alternative to starting an anti-TNF.
n 143Open-label RCT - 2017 · LancetMust know
NOR-SWITCH
Switch to CT-P13 vs stay on originator infliximab · UC and CD
Disease worsening95% CI
Disease worsening: −4.4 (95% CI −12.7 to 3.9). Non-inferiority margin −15 points.
−4.4 points (95% CI −12.7 to 3.9)
Switching stable patients from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 is not inferior to staying on the originator; this underpins provincial biosimilar switching policies.
n 482Phase 4 double-blind RCT - 2017 · N Engl J MedMust know
OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, OCTAVE Sustain
Tofacitinib vs placebo · UC
OCTAVE SustainRemission, week 52
OCTAVE Sustain, Remission, week 52: Tofacitinib 10 mg 40.6%, Tofacitinib 5 mg 34.3%, Placebo 11.1%.
P<0.001 for both doses vs placebo
Tofacitinib is an effective oral induction and maintenance therapy for UC, but its infection (especially zoster), cardiovascular and cancer signals shape who should receive it.
n 1,139Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2016 · Lancet
ADMIRE-CD
Darvadstrocel vs placebo · Perianal CD
Intention to treat97.5% CI
Intention to treat: +15.2 (97.5% CI 0.2–30.3).
+15.2 points (97.5% CI 0.2–30.3)
ADMIRE-CD suggested benefit from stem-cell injection for complex perianal fistulas, but the larger ADMIRE CD II was negative and the product has been withdrawn in the EU and was never approved in Canada.
n 212Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2016 · Gastroenterology
Anti-TNF levels in newborns
Adalimumab vs infliximab in pregnancy · UC and CD
Primary result
Median infant:mother drug ratio at birth 1.21 (95% CI 0.94–1.49) for adalimumab and 1.97 (1.50–2.43) for infliximab. Full result on the page.
At birth, infliximab levels in the newborn are about twice the mother's and adalimumab levels are similar or slightly higher; both take months to clear (infliximab longest), which matters for live vaccines; combination with a thiopurine raised infant infection risk.
n 80Cohort study - 2016 · Lancet Gastroenterol HepatolMust know
CONSTRUCT
Infliximab vs ciclosporin · UC
Primary result
No difference: mean AUC 564.0 (SD 241.9) with infliximab vs 587.0 (SD 226.2) with ciclosporin; adjusted difference 7.9 (95% CI −22.0 to 37.8); P=0.603
In steroid-refractory acute severe UC, infliximab and ciclosporin are equally effective rescue therapies; choose by local experience, patient factors and the maintenance plan.
n 270Open-label RCT - 2016 · Gastroenterology
PREVENT
Postoperative infliximab vs placebo · CD
Clinical recurrence95% CI
Clinical recurrence: +7.1 (95% CI −1.3 to 15.5).
+7.1 points (95% CI −1.3 to 15.5)
In patients at increased risk, postoperative infliximab roughly halves endoscopic recurrence but did not significantly reduce clinical recurrence by week 76, so endoscopic monitoring is still needed.
n 297Double-blind RCT - 2016 · Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
TOPPIC
Mercaptopurine vs placebo · CD
All patients95% CI
All patients: 0.54 (95% CI 0.27–1.06).
Adjusted HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.27–1.06); P=0.07
Postoperative mercaptopurine did not clearly prevent clinical recurrence overall; the benefit was confined to smokers, and stopping smoking matters more.
n 240Double-blind RCT - 2016 · N Engl J Med
UNITI-1, UNITI-2 and IM-UNITI
Ustekinumab vs placebo · CD
UNITI-1: anti-TNF failureClinical response, week 6
UNITI-1: anti-TNF failure, Clinical response, week 6: 130 mg IV 34.3%, About 6 mg/kg IV 33.7%, Placebo 21.5%.
Week-6 response 33.7% vs 21.5% after anti-TNF failure; 55.5% vs 28.7% without
IV ustekinumab induction followed by SC maintenance is effective in Crohn's disease, with larger effects in anti-TNF-naive patients.
n 1,369Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2015 · LancetMust know
POCER
6-month colonoscopy with step-up vs standard care · CD
Endoscopic recurrenceRutgeerts ≥i2 at 18 months · lower is better
Endoscopic recurrence, Rutgeerts ≥i2 at 18 months · lower is better: Active care 49%, Standard care 67%.
P=0.03
After resection, treating by risk and scoping at 6 months with step-up for recurrence beats drug prophylaxis alone; this is why we do a postoperative colonoscopy.
n 174RCT - 2015 · LancetMust know
REACT
Early combined immunosuppression vs conventional step-up care · CD
Primary result
66.0% (SD 14.0) at early-combined-immunosuppression practices vs 61.9% (SD 16.9) at conventional practices; adjusted difference 2.5% (95% CI −5.2 to 10.2); P=0.5169.
Early combined immunosuppression did not improve 1-year symptom remission but lowered 2-year surgery, admissions and complications, supporting early effective therapy.
n 1,982Open-label cluster RCT - 2015 · GastroenterologyMust know
TAXIT
Trough-based vs clinically based infliximab dosing · UC and CD
Clinical and biochemical remission1 year
Clinical and biochemical remission, 1 year: Trough-based 69%, Clinically based 66%.
P=0.686
A one-time optimisation to an infliximab trough of 3–7 µg/mL is worthwhile (fewer relapses, lower cost when levels are high), but repeated proactive trough-based dosing did not increase 1-year remission.
n 263RCT - 2014 · Gastroenterology
GEMINI 3
Vedolizumab vs placebo after anti-TNF failure · CD
Clinical remissionWeek 6
Clinical remission, Week 6: Vedolizumab 15.2%, Placebo 12.1%.
Week-6 remission 15.2% vs 12.1% (P=0.433); 26.6% vs 12.1% by week 10
After anti-TNF failure in Crohn's disease, vedolizumab missed its week-6 remission endpoint but showed benefit by week 10, so judge response later than with faster-acting drugs.
n 416Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2014 · Gastroenterology
PURSUIT-SC and PURSUIT-M
Golimumab vs placebo · UC
Clinical responseInduction · week 6 · two doses 2 weeks apart
Clinical response, Induction · week 6 · two doses 2 weeks apart: 200/100 mg 51.0%, 400/200 mg 54.9%, Placebo 30.3%.
P≤0.0001 for both doses vs placebo
Subcutaneous golimumab induces and maintains response in anti-TNF-naive UC; the remission and mucosal-healing benefit in maintenance was seen with 100 mg every 4 weeks.
n 1,064Phase 2 double-blind RCT - 2014 · GastroenterologyMust know
UC-SUCCESS
Infliximab + azathioprine vs either alone · UC
Corticosteroid-free remissionWeek 16
Corticosteroid-free remission, Week 16: Combination 39.7%, Infliximab 22.1%, Azathioprine 23.7%.
Steroid-free remission 39.7% with combination vs 22.1% with infliximab alone
When starting infliximab in anti-TNF-naive UC, adding azathioprine improves steroid-free remission at 16 weeks (40% vs 22%).
n 239Double-blind RCT - 2013 · N Engl J MedMust know
GEMINI 1
Vedolizumab vs placebo · UC
Clinical responseWeek 6 · induction
Clinical response, Week 6 · induction: Vedolizumab 47.1%, Placebo 25.5%.
Adjusted difference +21.7 points (95% CI 11.6–31.7); P<0.001
Vedolizumab, a gut-selective anti-integrin, induces and maintains remission in UC, with every-8-week IV maintenance as the standard.
n 374Double-blind RCT - 2013 · N Engl J Med
GEMINI 2
Vedolizumab vs placebo · CD
Clinical remissionWeek 6 · induction, CDAI ≤150
Clinical remission, Week 6 · induction, CDAI ≤150: Vedolizumab 14.5%, Placebo 6.8%.
Week-6 remission 14.5% vs 6.8%; week-52 remission 39.0% vs 21.6%
Vedolizumab works in Crohn's disease but slowly: modest at week 6, clearer by week 10 and in maintenance, so it suits patients who can wait for the effect.
n 1,115Phase 3 double-blind RCT - 2012 · Lancet
CYSIF
Ciclosporin vs infliximab · UC
Treatment failure95% CI
Treatment failure: +6 (95% CI −7 to 19).
+6 points (95% CI −7 to 19)
Ciclosporin and infliximab perform similarly as rescue therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe UC, in the short and long term.
n 115Open-label RCT - 2012 · Gastroenterology
STORI
Stopping infliximab, antimetabolite continued · CD
Primary result
52 of 115 patients relapsed over a median follow-up of 28 months; 1-year relapse rate 43.9% ± 5.0%.
About half of patients relapse within a year of stopping infliximab from combination therapy, but most regain remission on re-treatment, and biomarkers identify a lower-risk group.
n 115Cohort study - 2012 · Gastroenterology
ULTRA 2
Adalimumab vs placebo · UC
Clinical remission, all patientsWeek 8
Clinical remission, all patients, Week 8: Adalimumab 16.5%, Placebo 9.3%.
Remission 16.5% vs 9.3% at week 8 and 17.3% vs 8.5% at week 52
Adalimumab works in UC, but absolute remission rates are modest, especially after prior anti-TNF failure.
n 494Double-blind RCT - 2010 · N Engl J MedMust know
SONIC
Infliximab + azathioprine vs either alone · CD
Corticosteroid-free remissionWeek 26
Corticosteroid-free remission, Week 26: Combination 56.8%, Infliximab 44.4%, Azathioprine 30.0%.
Steroid-free remission 56.8% (combination) vs 44.4% (infliximab) vs 30.0%
In thiopurine- and biologic-naive Crohn's disease, infliximab plus azathioprine beats either drug alone for steroid-free remission and mucosal healing.
n 508Double-blind RCT - 2005 · N Engl J MedMust know
ACT 1 and ACT 2
Infliximab vs placebo · UC
Clinical responseWeek 8 · ACT 1
Clinical response, Week 8 · ACT 1: 5 mg/kg 69%, 10 mg/kg 61%, Placebo 37%.
Week-8 response 69% (5 mg/kg) vs 37% placebo in ACT 1; P<0.001
Infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6, then every 8 weeks, induces and maintains response in moderate to severe UC; doubling the dose gave no consistent added benefit.
n 728Double-blind RCT
No trials match
Try a shorter word (for example “vedo” or “pregnan”), a drug class, or a year. Filters for disease, theme and must-know trials also narrow the list.