Landmark IBD trials · Summary of an original articleGastroenterology 2026;171:99–109

REScUECD · Biosimilars and dosing

The Effect of Dose Intensification After Secondary Loss of Response to Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease: Results of the REScUE Study

Bossuyt P, et al.

Figure 1. Outcomes after a single IV ustekinumab reinduction, then 90 mg SC every 4 or every 8 weeks, in Crohn's disease with secondary loss of response.
Data for this figure, percentage of patients
EndpointEvery 4 weeksEvery 8 weeksDifference
Steroid-free clinical remission, Week 48 · PRO2 remission, calprotectin below 250 µg/g, no steroids (primary endpoint)15%19%Difference 4%; P=0.5
Serious adverse events, Lower is better17%13%

Both arms had IV reinduction, so the trial tests the dosing interval, not reinduction itself.

Source: Bossuyt 2026, abstract (108 randomised). The abstract gives percentages only, without counts or confidence intervals.

Structured abstract

BackgroundSecondary loss of response to ustekinumab occurs in Crohn's disease, and several dose-intensification regimens were in use without a prospective randomised comparison.

MethodsInvestigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (15 hospitals in Belgium). 108 patients. Primary endpoint: Steroid-free clinical remission at week 48: PRO2 remission (abdominal pain ≤1 and stool frequency ≤3), faecal calprotectin below 250 µg/g, and no steroids in the 90 days before week 48.

ResultsPrimary result. 15% (every 4 weeks) vs 19% (every 8 weeks); difference 4%; P=0.5.

Take-homeAfter secondary loss of response to ustekinumab, IV reinduction plus every-4-week dosing is no better than reinduction plus every-8-week dosing, and few patients regain remission either way.

Table 1. Trial at a glance
Patients108
PopulationAdults with Crohn's disease on ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks with secondary loss of response (PRO2: abdominal pain score above 1 and more than 3 liquid or very soft stools) and objective evidence of disease.
ComparisonA single IV ustekinumab reinduction (about 6 mg/kg), then 90 mg SC every 4 weeks vs every 8 weeks, until week 48
Drugsustekinumab
ClassesAnti-IL-12/23
PublishedBossuyt P, et al. Gastroenterology 2026;171:99–109.

Key points

  • Shortening the interval to every 4 weeks after IV reinduction was not better than continuing every 8 weeks.
  • Serious adverse events: 17% vs 13%.
  • Remission rates were low in both arms, so dose intensification rarely rescues secondary loss of response to ustekinumab.

Limitations

  • No arm without IV reinduction, so the effect of reinduction itself cannot be judged.
  • Moderate sample size from one country.
  • Strict composite primary endpoint including calprotectin and steroid-free status.

Commentary

REScUE is one of the few randomised trials of dose escalation for loss of response. It argues against relying on interval shortening of ustekinumab and in favour of an early switch. After anti-TNF exposure, SEQUENCE supports an IL-23 p19 inhibitor. Check for objective inflammation and other causes of symptoms (strictures, bile acid diarrhea, infection) before changing therapy.

Journal club

PopulationAdults with Crohn's disease on ustekinumab 90 mg SC every 8 weeks with secondary loss of response (PRO2: abdominal pain score above 1 and more than 3 liquid or very soft stools) and objective evidence of disease.
InterventionA single IV ustekinumab reinduction (about 6 mg/kg), then 90 mg SC every 4 weeks
ComparisonEvery 8 weeks, until week 48
Primary outcomeSteroid-free clinical remission at week 48: PRO2 remission (abdominal pain ≤1 and stool frequency ≤3), faecal calprotectin below 250 µg/g, and no steroids in the 90 days before week 48.

Design

Investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (15 hospitals in Belgium). 108 patients.

Primary result. 15% (every 4 weeks) vs 19% (every 8 weeks); difference 4%; P=0.5.

Validity and applicability

  • No arm without IV reinduction, so the effect of reinduction itself cannot be judged.
  • Moderate sample size from one country.
  • Strict composite primary endpoint including calprotectin and steroid-free status.

Where it sits now

After secondary loss of response to ustekinumab, IV reinduction plus every-4-week dosing is no better than reinduction plus every-8-week dosing, and few patients regain remission either way.

  • SEQUENCE (2024): After anti-TNF failure, risankizumab beats ustekinumab for endoscopic remission, so an IL-23 p19 inhibitor is the stronger second-line choice of the two.
  • LIBERTY-CD (2024): After IV infliximab induction, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks maintains remission and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease, an option for patients who prefer injections to infusions.
  • SERENE-CD (2022): Extra-intensive adalimumab induction does not beat the standard 160/80 mg regimen, and proactive TDM-guided maintenance was no better than dosing adjusted to symptoms and CRP.
  • VISIBLE 2 (2022): After two IV doses, vedolizumab 108 mg SC every 2 weeks maintains remission in Crohn's disease better than placebo, so patients can switch to home injections.

Questions for discussion

  1. Both arms received IV reinduction. What question would a third arm without reinduction have answered?
  2. The primary endpoint required PRO2 remission, a calprotectin below 250 µg/g and no steroids. How does a strict composite affect the chance of showing a difference?
  3. After secondary loss of response to ustekinumab, when would you intensify and when would you switch class?
Report a problem with this trial

Please don't include patient information. This form isn't for medical questions.

Try “pregnancy”, “Mayo”, “calprotectin” or “VARSITY”.