Landmark IBD trials · Summary of an original articleN Engl J Med 2019;381:1201–14

UNIFIMust knowUC · Induction and maintenance

Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

Sands BE, et al.

Figure 1. Clinical remission at week 8 after a single IV induction dose, and at week 44 in induction responders re-randomised to subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg or placebo.
Data for this figure, percentage of patients
Endpoint130 mg IVAbout 6 mg/kg IV90 mg SC every 12 weeks90 mg SC every 8 weeksPlaceboDifference
Clinical remission, Week 8 · induction (primary endpoint)15.6%15.5%not in this comparisonnot in this comparison5.3%P<0.001 for both doses vs placebo
Clinical remission, Week 44 · re-randomised responders (primary endpoint)not in this comparisonnot in this comparison38.4%43.8%24.0%Every 12 weeks P=0.002; every 8 weeks P<0.001 vs placebo

About 1 in 6 patients was in remission 8 weeks after one IV dose; maintenance results apply only to those who responded.

Source: Sands 2019, abstract. The induction and maintenance placebo groups are different patients.

Structured abstract

BackgroundUstekinumab, an antibody to the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23, was approved for Crohn's disease, but its efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy in UC was unknown.

MethodsPhase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled: 8-week IV induction and 44-week randomised-withdrawal SC maintenance. 961 patients. Primary endpoint: Clinical remission (total Mayo ≤2, no subscore >1) at week 8 (induction) and week 44 (maintenance).

ResultsPrimary result. Week 8: 15.6% (130 mg) and 15.5% (6 mg/kg) vs 5.3% (P<0.001 for both). Week 44: 38.4% (every 12 weeks) and 43.8% (every 8 weeks) vs 24.0% (P=0.002 and P<0.001).

Take-homeUstekinumab, an IL-12/23 antibody, induces and maintains remission in UC with a reassuring safety profile.

Table 1. Trial at a glance
Patients961
PopulationModerate to severe UC. Maintenance: 523 responders to IV ustekinumab induction re-randomised (172 every 12 weeks, 176 every 8 weeks, 175 placebo).
ComparisonUstekinumab IV 130 mg or about 6 mg/kg (weight-range dosing) vs placebo; responders randomised to 90 mg SC every 12 weeks, every 8 weeks, or placebo
Drugsustekinumab
ClassesAnti-IL-12/23
PublishedSands BE, et al. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1201–14.

Key points

  • Serious adverse events were similar to placebo.
  • Through 52 weeks: 2 deaths and 7 cancers among 825 ustekinumab-treated patients vs no deaths and 1 cancer among 319 placebo patients.
  • The weight-based (about 6 mg/kg) single IV induction dose became the standard.

Limitations

  • Modest induction remission rates (about 15%).
  • Maintenance used randomised withdrawal of induction responders.
  • No active comparator.

Commentary

Why it matters. UNIFI added a new mechanism (IL-12/23 blockade) for UC with a convenient schedule: one IV dose, then injections every 8 or 12 weeks. Its safety record from psoriasis and Crohn’s disease made it attractive for older patients and those with comorbidities.

What came after. Selective IL-23 p19 antibodies followed: mirikizumab (LUCENT, PMID 37379135), risankizumab (INSPIRE and COMMAND, PMID 39037800) and guselkumab (QUASAR, PMID 39706209).

Canada. Ustekinumab biosimilars are now marketed in Canada.

Journal club

PopulationModerate to severe UC. Maintenance: 523 responders to IV ustekinumab induction re-randomised (172 every 12 weeks, 176 every 8 weeks, 175 placebo).
InterventionUstekinumab IV 130 mg or about 6 mg/kg (weight-range dosing)
ComparisonPlacebo; responders randomised to 90 mg SC every 12 weeks, every 8 weeks, or placebo
Primary outcomeClinical remission (total Mayo ≤2, no subscore >1) at week 8 (induction) and week 44 (maintenance)

Design

Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled: 8-week IV induction and 44-week randomised-withdrawal SC maintenance. 961 patients.

Primary result. Week 8: 15.6% (130 mg) and 15.5% (6 mg/kg) vs 5.3% (P<0.001 for both). Week 44: 38.4% (every 12 weeks) and 43.8% (every 8 weeks) vs 24.0% (P=0.002 and P<0.001).

Validity and applicability

  • Modest induction remission rates (about 15%).
  • Maintenance used randomised withdrawal of induction responders.
  • No active comparator.

Where it sits now

Ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 antibody, induces and maintains remission in UC with a reassuring safety profile.

  • ASTRO (2026): Guselkumab can be started with subcutaneous 400 mg injections instead of IV infusions, with clear benefit over placebo by week 12.
  • RELIEVE UCCD (UC) (2026): Duvakitug, an anti-TL1A antibody, showed a dose-related remission signal in UC in phase 2b; phase 3 trials will decide its place.
  • QUASAR (2025): Guselkumab induces and maintains remission in UC, and the follow-up ASTRO trial showed induction can be given subcutaneously.
  • TUSCANY-2 (2025): Afimkibart missed its phase 2b primary endpoint (total Mayo remission), although remission by the modified Mayo score favoured it; anti-TL1A therapy still needs phase 3 proof.

Questions for discussion

  1. Induction remission was about 15% at week 8. Would you judge ustekinumab at week 8, or wait longer before switching?
  2. Every-8-week dosing gave numerically more remission than every 12 weeks. How would you choose the interval?
  3. Maintenance re-randomised responders. How does that affect comparison with a treat-through trial such as ULTRA 2?
Report a problem with this trial

Please don't include patient information. This form isn't for medical questions.

Try “pregnancy”, “Mayo”, “calprotectin” or “VARSITY”.