Landmark IBD trials · Summary of an original articleAm J Gastroenterol 2024;119:1365–72

TACOSUC · Acute severe colitis

Tofacitinib in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (TACOS): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Singh A, et al.

Figure 1. Response by day 7 (Lichtiger index down by more than 3 points and below 10 for 2 consecutive days, without rescue therapy) in acute severe UC, with both arms on IV hydrocortisone.
Data for this figure, percentage of patients
EndpointTofacitinibPlaceboDifference
Response by day 7 (primary endpoint)83.01% (44/53)58.82% (30/51)OR 3.42 (95% CI 1.37–8.48); P=0.007

The effect lasted: the cumulative probability of needing infliximab or colectomy by day 90 was 0.13 vs 0.38 (log-rank P=0.003).

Source: Singh 2024, abstract (intention to treat).

Structured abstract

BackgroundAbout 30–40% of patients with acute severe UC do not respond to IV corticosteroids. Whether adding a fast-acting oral JAK inhibitor improves early response had not been tested in a randomised trial.

MethodsSingle-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. 104 patients. Primary endpoint: Response by day 7 (Lichtiger index down by more than 3 points and an absolute score below 10 for 2 consecutive days, without rescue therapy).

ResultsPrimary result. 83.01% (44/53) vs 58.82% (30/51); odds ratio 3.42 (95% CI 1.37–8.48); P=0.007

Take-homeAdding tofacitinib to IV steroids improved day-7 response in acute severe UC in one small single-centre trial; promising, but not yet standard care.

Table 1. Trial at a glance
Patients104
PopulationAdults with acute severe UC (Truelove and Witts criteria) receiving IV hydrocortisone 100 mg every 6 hours
ComparisonTofacitinib 10 mg three times daily vs placebo for 7 days, added to IV corticosteroids
Drugstofacitinib
ClassesJAK inhibitor
PublishedSingh A, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119:1365–72.

Key points

  • Need for rescue therapy by day 7 was lower with tofacitinib: odds ratio 0.27 (95% CI 0.09–0.78); P=0.01.
  • Cumulative probability of needing rescue therapy (infliximab or colectomy) by day 90: 0.13 vs 0.38 (log-rank P=0.003).
  • Most adverse effects were mild; one patient on tofacitinib developed dural venous sinus thrombosis.

Limitations

  • Single centre and small.
  • Tofacitinib 10 mg three times daily is an off-label, higher-than-licensed dose.
  • Acute severe UC is a high-thrombosis-risk state, and the one cerebral venous thrombosis is a relevant warning for JAK inhibitors in this setting.

Commentary

Context. TACOS is a placebo-controlled randomised trial of a JAK inhibitor in acute severe UC. It tested tofacitinib added to IV steroids during the first 7 days, not as rescue after steroid failure, so it does not replace infliximab or ciclosporin rescue (see CONSTRUCT, PMID 27595142).

In practice. JAK inhibitors for acute severe UC are off-label and best used within specialist protocols, with thromboprophylaxis and attention to thrombotic risk. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of JAK inhibitors in acute severe UC were published in 2025–26 (for example PMID 41690364), but large randomised trials are still needed.

Journal club

PopulationAdults with acute severe UC (Truelove and Witts criteria) receiving IV hydrocortisone 100 mg every 6 hours
InterventionTofacitinib 10 mg three times daily
ComparisonPlacebo for 7 days, added to IV corticosteroids
Primary outcomeResponse by day 7 (Lichtiger index down by more than 3 points and an absolute score below 10 for 2 consecutive days, without rescue therapy)

Design

Single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. 104 patients.

Primary result. 83.01% (44/53) vs 58.82% (30/51); odds ratio 3.42 (95% CI 1.37–8.48); P=0.007

Validity and applicability

  • Single centre and small.
  • Tofacitinib 10 mg three times daily is an off-label, higher-than-licensed dose.
  • Acute severe UC is a high-thrombosis-risk state, and the one cerebral venous thrombosis is a relevant warning for JAK inhibitors in this setting.

Where it sits now

Adding tofacitinib to IV steroids improved day-7 response in acute severe UC in one small single-centre trial; promising, but not yet standard care.

  • ACTIVE (2025): After a steroid-responsive episode of acute severe UC in a thiopurine- and biologic-naive patient, starting infliximab plus azathioprine reduced 1-year treatment failure compared with azathioprine alone.
  • PREDICT-UC (2024): In steroid-refractory acute severe UC, a 10 mg/kg first infliximab dose or an accelerated schedule was not better than standard 5 mg/kg dosing.
  • CONSTRUCT (2016): In steroid-refractory acute severe UC, infliximab and ciclosporin are equally effective rescue therapies; choose by local experience, patient factors and the maintenance plan.
  • CYSIF (2012): Ciclosporin and infliximab perform similarly as rescue therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe UC, in the short and long term.

Questions for discussion

  1. The dose was 10 mg three times daily, above the licensed dose. How would you weigh it against the thrombotic risk of acute severe colitis?
  2. Response was judged by the Lichtiger index at day 7. How does that compare with the day-3 criteria you use to decide on rescue therapy?
  3. If a patient fails steroids plus tofacitinib, how does that affect the next step: infliximab, ciclosporin or colectomy?
Report a problem with this trial

Please don't include patient information. This form isn't for medical questions.

Try “pregnancy”, “Mayo”, “calprotectin” or “VARSITY”.