Landmark IBD trials · Summary of an original articleGut 2026 (published online ahead of print)

USTAPPerianal CD · Induction and maintenance

Ustekinumab for fistulising perianal Crohn's disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial from the GETAID

Wils P, et al.

Figure 1. Remission of perianal fistulas at week 12, ustekinumab vs placebo: the combined primary endpoint and its two components. Clinical remission is no drainage from any external opening; radiological remission is no abscess larger than 2 cm on blinded central MRI. Squares are odds ratios; lines are 95% CIs. Log scale.
Data for this figure: Odds ratio (95% CI). Left of the null line: Favours placebo. Right: Favours ustekinumab.
OutcomeUstekinumabPlaceboEstimate (confidence interval)P
Combined remission, Primary endpoint (primary)62%25%5.1 (95% CI 1.07–24.4)
Clinical remission, No drainage62.5%31%3.75 (95% CI 0.84–16.8)
Radiological remission, No abscess over 2 cm on MRI87.5%75%2.7 (95% CI 0.34–21.1)

With 16 patients per arm every interval is wide and neither component alone was significant. Radiological remission reached 75% even with placebo, after standardised surgical management.

Source: Wils 2026, abstract (16 patients per arm; 69% had previous anti-TNF failure). Percentages and odds ratios as printed.

Structured abstract

BackgroundFistulising perianal Crohn's disease is debilitating, yet few randomised trials have studied it. USTAP was a placebo-controlled trial of ustekinumab designed specifically for perianal fistulas, after surgical management.

MethodsDouble-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (GETAID; 10 French centres), with an open-label phase after week 12. 32 patients. Primary endpoint: Combined clinical remission (no drainage from all external openings) and radiological remission (no abscess larger than 2 cm on blinded central MRI) at week 12.

ResultsPrimary result. 62% with ustekinumab vs 25% with placebo; OR 5.1 (95% CI 1.07–24.4).

Take-homeIn a small trial, ustekinumab after surgical drainage improved short-term combined clinical and MRI remission of perianal fistulas, but the effect was uncertain by week 48.

Table 1. Trial at a glance
Patients32
PopulationAdults with Crohn's disease and active draining perianal fistulas, after standardised surgical management. 69% had previous anti-TNF failure.
ComparisonUstekinumab (6 mg/kg IV, 90 mg SC at week 8, then every 8 weeks) vs placebo
Drugsustekinumab
ClassesAnti-IL-12/23
PublishedWils P, et al. Gut 2026 (published online ahead of print).

Key points

  • Clinical remission at week 12: 62.5% vs 31% (OR 3.75, 95% CI 0.84–16.8).
  • Radiological remission at week 12: 87.5% vs 75% (OR 2.7, 95% CI 0.34–21.1).
  • Nine placebo patients switched to ustekinumab in the open-label phase; at week 48, combined remission was 50% in the original placebo arm and 31% in the ustekinumab arm.
  • Designed specifically for perianal fistulas, with 16 patients per arm.

Limitations

  • Very small (32 patients), with wide confidence intervals.
  • Short primary endpoint (week 12); crossover and dose intensification after week 12 make the week 48 results hard to interpret.
  • Single country.

Commentary

Most evidence for biologics in perianal Crohn’s disease comes from anti-TNF trials. USTAP adds randomised placebo-controlled evidence for ustekinumab in a trial designed specifically for perianal fistulas, and supports it as an option, especially after anti-TNF failure. Surgical drainage and setons first remain essential.

Journal club

PopulationAdults with Crohn's disease and active draining perianal fistulas, after standardised surgical management. 69% had previous anti-TNF failure.
InterventionUstekinumab (6 mg/kg IV, 90 mg SC at week 8, then every 8 weeks)
ComparisonPlacebo
Primary outcomeCombined clinical remission (no drainage from all external openings) and radiological remission (no abscess larger than 2 cm on blinded central MRI) at week 12.

Design

Double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (GETAID; 10 French centres), with an open-label phase after week 12. 32 patients.

Primary result. 62% with ustekinumab vs 25% with placebo; OR 5.1 (95% CI 1.07–24.4).

Validity and applicability

  • Very small (32 patients), with wide confidence intervals.
  • Short primary endpoint (week 12); crossover and dose intensification after week 12 make the week 48 results hard to interpret.
  • Single country.

Where it sits now

In a small trial, ustekinumab after surgical drainage improved short-term combined clinical and MRI remission of perianal fistulas, but the effect was uncertain by week 48.

Questions for discussion

  1. With 16 patients per arm, the odds ratio's 95% CI ran from 1.07 to 24.4. How would you describe the size of the benefit to a patient?
  2. Radiological remission was 75% even with placebo. What does this say about the contribution of surgical drainage and setons?
  3. At week 48, combined remission was 50% in the original placebo arm and 31% with ustekinumab. How do crossover and intensification make later results hard to read?
Report a problem with this trial

Please don't include patient information. This form isn't for medical questions.

Try “pregnancy”, “Mayo”, “calprotectin” or “VARSITY”.