Landmark IBD trials · Summary of an original articleN Engl J Med 2013;369:711–21

GEMINI 2CD · Induction and maintenance

Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease

Sandborn WJ, et al.

Figure 1. Induction at week 6 (cohort 1, vedolizumab or placebo at weeks 0 and 2) and maintenance at week 52 (induction responders re-randomised to vedolizumab every 8 or 4 weeks, or placebo).
Data for this figure, percentage of patients
EndpointVedolizumabEvery 8 weeksEvery 4 weeksPlaceboDifference
Clinical remission, Week 6 · induction, CDAI ≤150 (primary endpoint)14.5%not in this comparisonnot in this comparison6.8%P=0.02
CDAI-100 response, Week 6 · induction (primary endpoint)31.4%not in this comparisonnot in this comparison25.7%P=0.23 (not significant)
Clinical remission, Week 52 · randomised-withdrawal maintenance (primary endpoint)not in this comparison39.0%36.4%21.6%P<0.001 (every 8 weeks) and P=0.004 (every 4 weeks) vs placebo

The week-6 effect was small; maintenance, in patients who had already responded, showed the clearer benefit.

Source: Sandborn 2013, abstract. The abstract gives no counts or confidence intervals.

Structured abstract

BackgroundVedolizumab, a gut-selective anti-α4β7 integrin antibody, was being tested in UC in GEMINI 1; whether it worked in Crohn's disease was unknown.

MethodsIntegrated phase 3 study: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction trial plus randomised-withdrawal maintenance trial. 1,115 patients. Primary endpoint: Induction: clinical remission (CDAI ≤150) and CDAI-100 response at week 6. Maintenance: clinical remission at week 52.

ResultsPrimary result. Week 6 remission 14.5% vs 6.8% (P=0.02); CDAI-100 response 31.4% vs 25.7% (P=0.23, not significant). Week 52 remission 39.0% (every 8 weeks) and 36.4% (every 4 weeks) vs 21.6% with placebo (P<0.001 and P=0.004).

Take-homeVedolizumab works in Crohn's disease but slowly: modest at week 6, clearer by week 10 and in maintenance, so it suits patients who can wait for the effect.

Table 1. Trial at a glance
Patients1,115
PopulationAdults aged 18–80 with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to immunomodulators, TNF antagonists or corticosteroids. Induction: 368 randomised (cohort 1) plus 747 open-label (cohort 2). Maintenance: 461 responders randomised.
ComparisonVedolizumab 300 mg IV vs placebo for induction and maintenance
Drugsvedolizumab
ClassesAnti-integrin
PublishedSandborn WJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:711–21.

Key points

  • Induction at weeks 0 and 2; responders were randomised to vedolizumab every 8 weeks, every 4 weeks, or placebo until week 52.
  • Serious adverse events 24.4% vs 15.3%; infections 44.1% vs 40.2%; serious infections 5.5% vs 3.0% (vedolizumab vs placebo).
  • Antibodies against vedolizumab developed in 4.0% of patients.
  • Dosing every 4 weeks was no better than every 8 weeks in maintenance.
  • GEMINI 3 (anti-TNF failures): week 6 remission was not significant (15.2% vs 12.1%; P=0.433) but became apparent by week 10 (26.6% vs 12.1%; nominal P=0.001) (PMID 24859203).

Limitations

  • Short (6-week) induction assessment for a slow-acting drug.
  • Symptom-based endpoints (CDAI) without endoscopic outcomes.
  • Mixed population of anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF-experienced patients.

Commentary

GEMINI 2 led to the approval of vedolizumab for Crohn’s disease. Its gut-selective mechanism (blocking α4β7 integrin) makes it attractive for older patients or those with infection or malignancy concerns, but the slow onset means a bridge (often steroids) is commonly needed.

Vedolizumab is also the only drug with a randomised trial in chronic pouchitis (EARNEST), and it reduced endoscopic recurrence after ileocolonic resection in REPREVIO.

Related. GEMINI 3 tested three-dose induction after anti-TNF failure, and VISIBLE 2 showed that, after two IV doses, subcutaneous vedolizumab 108 mg every 2 weeks maintains remission in Crohn’s disease (48.0% vs 34.3% with placebo at week 52).

Journal club

PopulationAdults aged 18–80 with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to immunomodulators, TNF antagonists or corticosteroids. Induction: 368 randomised (cohort 1) plus 747 open-label (cohort 2). Maintenance: 461 responders randomised.
InterventionVedolizumab 300 mg IV
ComparisonPlacebo for induction and maintenance
Primary outcomeInduction: clinical remission (CDAI ≤150) and CDAI-100 response at week 6. Maintenance: clinical remission at week 52.

Design

Integrated phase 3 study: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction trial plus randomised-withdrawal maintenance trial. 1,115 patients.

Primary result. Week 6 remission 14.5% vs 6.8% (P=0.02); CDAI-100 response 31.4% vs 25.7% (P=0.23, not significant). Week 52 remission 39.0% (every 8 weeks) and 36.4% (every 4 weeks) vs 21.6% with placebo (P<0.001 and P=0.004).

Validity and applicability

  • Short (6-week) induction assessment for a slow-acting drug.
  • Symptom-based endpoints (CDAI) without endoscopic outcomes.
  • Mixed population of anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF-experienced patients.

Where it sits now

Vedolizumab works in Crohn's disease but slowly: modest at week 6, clearer by week 10 and in maintenance, so it suits patients who can wait for the effect.

  • EARNEST (2023): Vedolizumab is the first advanced therapy shown in a randomised trial to induce remission in chronic pouchitis.
  • REPREVIO (2025): Starting vedolizumab within 4 weeks of ileocolonic resection reduces early endoscopic recurrence in patients at risk.
  • GEMINI 3 (2014): After anti-TNF failure in Crohn's disease, vedolizumab missed its week-6 remission endpoint but showed benefit by week 10, so judge response later than with faster-acting drugs.
  • VISIBLE 2 (2022): After two IV doses, vedolizumab 108 mg SC every 2 weeks maintains remission in Crohn's disease better than placebo, so patients can switch to home injections.

Questions for discussion

  1. One week-6 co-primary endpoint was met and the other was not. How should you interpret a trial with split co-primary results?
  2. Induction was two doses judged at week 6. How did GEMINI 3 change the induction schedule and the time point for judging response?
  3. Serious adverse events were 24.4% vs 15.3%. How would you explain that to a patient, given vedolizumab's reputation for safety?
Report a problem with this trial

Please don't include patient information. This form isn't for medical questions.

Try “pregnancy”, “Mayo”, “calprotectin” or “VARSITY”.