REPREVIOCD · Surgery
Vedolizumab to prevent postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (REPREVIO): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
D'Haens G, et al.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025 · PMID 39571587 (PubMed, opens in a new tab) · doi 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00317-0 (full paper, opens in a new tab)
| Outcome at week 26 | Vedolizumab (n=43) | Placebo (n=37) | Effect (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Rutgeerts score, whole distribution (primary) (primary endpoint) | — | — | Probability of a lower score with vedolizumab 77.8% (66.4–86.3); P<0.0001 |
| Severe endoscopic recurrence (≥i2b) | 10/43 (23.3%) | 23/37 (62.2%) | Difference −38.9% (−56.0 to −17.3); P=0.0004 |
| Serious adverse events | 3/43 (7.0%) | 2/37 (5.4%) | — |
A probability of 50% would mean no difference between the groups.
Source: D'Haens 2025, abstract (patients who received at least one dose).
Structured abstract
BackgroundEndoscopic recurrence is common in the first year after ileocolonic resection. Anti-TNF prophylaxis was the main option; whether gut-selective vedolizumab prevents recurrence had not been tested against placebo.
MethodsMulticentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (13 hospitals in France, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain). 84 patients. Primary endpoint: Distribution of modified Rutgeerts scores at week 26 (video-recorded, central reading).
ResultsPrimary result. Probability of a lower modified Rutgeerts score with vedolizumab than placebo: 77.8% (95% CI 66.4–86.3); P<0.0001.
Take-homeStarting vedolizumab within 4 weeks of ileocolonic resection reduces early endoscopic recurrence in patients at risk.
| Patients | 84 |
|---|---|
| Population | Adults with Crohn's disease after ileocolonic resection with at least one risk factor for recurrence, randomised within 4 weeks of surgery. 80 received study drug (43 vedolizumab, 37 placebo). |
| Comparison | Vedolizumab 300 mg IV vs placebo at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24 |
| Drugs | vedolizumab |
| Classes | Anti-integrin |
| Published | D'Haens G, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025;10:26–33. |
Key points
- Severe endoscopic recurrence (modified Rutgeerts ≥i2b) at week 26: 23.3% (10/43) vs 62.2% (23/37); difference −38.9% (95% CI −56.0 to −17.3); P=0.0004.
- Serious adverse events: 7.0% (3/43) vedolizumab vs 5.4% (2/37) placebo.
- Gives a randomised option for postoperative prophylaxis in patients for whom an anti-TNF is unsuitable.
Limitations
- Small trial with a 26-week endpoint; clinical recurrence and longer-term outcomes were not assessed.
- No comparison with anti-TNF prophylaxis.
- Funded by Takeda Nederland.
Journal club
Design
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (13 hospitals in France, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain). 84 patients.
Primary result. Probability of a lower modified Rutgeerts score with vedolizumab than placebo: 77.8% (95% CI 66.4–86.3); P<0.0001.
Validity and applicability
- Small trial with a 26-week endpoint; clinical recurrence and longer-term outcomes were not assessed.
- No comparison with anti-TNF prophylaxis.
- Funded by Takeda Nederland.
Where it sits now
Starting vedolizumab within 4 weeks of ileocolonic resection reduces early endoscopic recurrence in patients at risk.
- PREVENT (2016): In patients at increased risk, postoperative infliximab roughly halves endoscopic recurrence but did not significantly reduce clinical recurrence by week 76, so endoscopic monitoring is still needed.
- POCER (2015): After resection, treating by risk and scoping at 6 months with step-up for recurrence beats drug prophylaxis alone; this is why we do a postoperative colonoscopy.
- SPICY (2024): Removing more mesentery at primary ileocolic resection did not reduce 6-month endoscopic recurrence, and leaks were numerically more common.
- LIR!C (2017): For limited (40 cm or less), non-stricturing terminal ileal Crohn's disease that has failed conventional therapy, laparoscopic resection is a reasonable alternative to starting an anti-TNF.
Questions for discussion
- The primary endpoint was the probability of a lower score rather than a recurrence rate. What are the advantages and drawbacks of that choice?
- With no anti-TNF comparator, when would you choose vedolizumab rather than an anti-TNF after resection?
- The endpoint was at 26 weeks. What follow-up would you want before relying on vedolizumab prophylaxis?