SES-CD

Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease, with partial-exam handling

Reviewed October 2026

For healthcare professionals. A decision aid, not a substitute for clinical judgement.

For each segment pick Normal, Findings or Not reached. A segment you didn't see is left out of the total, never counted as 0.

Ileum
–
Right colon
–
Transverse colon
–
Left colon (sigmoid and descending)
–
Rectum
–
Total
–/60

Compare with baseline (optional)

Enter an earlier SES-CD from the same segments to check endoscopic response (a fall of more than 50%).

Baseline SES-CD

SES-CD

Answer 5 more items to see the result.

  • Ileum: examined or not
  • Right colon: examined or not
  • Transverse: examined or not
  • Left colon: examined or not
  • Rectum: examined or not

How to use it

Score five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon (sigmoid and descending) and rectum. In each, score four variables from 0 to 3: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and narrowing. The SES-CD is the sum, from 0 to 60 (in practice 0–56, since a narrowing that cannot be passed stops you reaching the segments beyond it).

For each segment, pick one:

  • Normal: you saw it and all four variables are 0.
  • Findings: score each variable. The segment subtotal updates as you go, and you can hide a finished segment.
  • Not reached: left out of the total. The result is then labelled partial, with the missing segments named.

Reading the result

SES-CD Usual label
0–2 Inactive
3–6 Mild
7–15 Moderate
16 or more Severe

These bands are the convention most trials have used; they came after the original validation and some studies draw the line between moderate and severe slightly differently (Koutroumpakis 2016).

STRIDE-II targets for Crohn’s disease:

  • Endoscopic healing (long-term target): SES-CD below 3, or no ulcers anywhere (every ulcer-size subscore 0).
  • Endoscopic response: a fall of more than 50% from baseline. Enter the baseline score to check it.

Partial examinations

The original score has no way to record a segment you did not see, so it quietly treats it as normal. Here an unexamined segment is excluded instead. A partial score can still be useful, but:

  • It may underestimate activity, especially if the ileum wasn’t intubated.
  • Compare it only with a score from the same segments. A response calculated against a full baseline can look better than it is.
  • Say in the report which segments were not reached and why (for example, a narrowing that couldn’t be passed, or poor preparation).

Pitfalls

  • Ulcer size and ulcerated surface go together. If there are no ulcers, both are 0. The tool flags a mismatch.
  • Affected surface counts any lesion, not just ulcers, so it can be higher than the ulcerated surface.
  • Isolated ileal disease has a low ceiling (at most 12 from one segment), so modest totals can still mean significant disease. Consider transmural assessment with intestinal ultrasound or MR enterography.
  • Postoperative recurrence at the anastomosis is graded with the Rutgeerts score, not the SES-CD.

Try “pregnancy”, “Mayo”, “calprotectin” or “VARSITY”.